Back to the Index

 

 

Schopenhauer and the Glad Obsession

It’s a common belief that the talent to write is a gift, but on the other side of that oxidized, sock-smoothed coin lies the fact of its compulsion, bordering on obsession; a rather unhealthy state, as mental health professionals would see it. Perhaps. But to he who has believed in it, who has believed in himself as a writer, it’s a holy ritual, a necessity.
       The digs of psychology would have us analyze the reasons for this need to transcribe thought to paper in the most basic of hypotheses:

  • Is writing simply self-gratification (masturbation)?
  • Is this drive an attempt at justification, a pre-emptive answer to an impending existential crisis?
  • Does the act thrive on the propagation of ideas for the purpose of “making a mark on the world,” of “marking one’s territory,” of confirming the validity, the golden nature of one’s own gene pool?
  • Is this a form of self-flagellation or repentance for a deeper idea that, after all, one may really be “nothing”? Therefore, a desperate attempt to be “something”?

      However, true mania needs no explanation. Roots of the compulsion aside, every writer knows: it’s all been said / done / written before. Reason asks, “Why continue?”, but the writer keeps on. The nature of that cliché beast? There is always more until there is no more. Ask any alcoholic, any workaholic, and he’ll tell you: there’s more—and less—to all of it than meets the eye.
      Once the writer has “the bug” and decides to take it / himself seriously, the compulsion is malignant, out of control. Words, perceptions, ideas—like cells—reproduce, gain momentum, with or without the body’s consent. In times of success, the writer is a great talent. He’s riding high with a tumor of gold, diamond-backed herpes, a lifetime supply of the drug he can’t put down. When frustrated, shunned, pushed aside, he’s a burnt-out shell of a being, a pouting child, defeated. In these times, the compulsion leaves an ulcerous void, a phantom limb, an absence that can’t be filled but with the writer’s own words. He’s sickly then, vulnerable—in need of his “stuff” —his own words, his own productivity—to feel complete, to fulfill the prophecy of his so-called “gift”.
      But there is a “bigger picture” than the mere continuum of obsessive-compulsive behavior. The disease metaphors aren’t enough; Schopenhauer’s had to go and stick his fingers in, too. There’s Individuation in the game, the drag of the writer’s development—a progression that he can’t see because of his own momentary suffering. Forest for the trees, can the writer note his own progress, his own (de-)evolution, except for in dreams, in hindsight? It’s a slow ripening (and one that can blind, freeze him in the act, on a daily basis). It starts, perhaps, with the jumbled, feral words scribbled down by an angst-ridden pre-adolescent in an early struggle for identity. He sees the Truth in the things he has written, recognizes the importance of the combinations of syllables that have poured from his pen. But sooner or later, he is ambitious and wants more, wants to improve. And so he begins studying the “craft”, trying to pull from others’ words, to learn from their styles, their techniques. Thus comes the slow progression away from the Self—or, what he, himself, would have written—and into the realms of imitation, of mimicry. Realizing one day, possibly decades later, that he cannot continue to evolve, to unfold (lest he come undone! lest he lose sight of himself! lest he fly so high that he never land again!), the writer, now increasingly selective and desperate to find his way back to what he deems to be his own truth, focuses exclusively on the ideas and styles which he holds to be worthy. He has learned from others, but now he both uses this acquired knowledge and follows the instinct for his own words, on the words that he knows to be true—and comes full circle. He has been schooled, has been hurtled from the Red Rover chain of his learning into a new direction of his own making, and has thus been educated, hardened, honed, tempered, and purged. For the first time since his adolescent years, he has returned to his own instinct for words.
      Perhaps it is at this point that the writer can see that he’s not borne the weight of his obsession throughout the long journey without purpose; the trees are in view again. Now, able to (even partially) fulfill his own expectations,—impressed, even, by finding his own road—, his acceptance and celebration of his obsession—of this tumor / herpes / phantom limb / loss-and-finding-of-Self—precludes any importance relegated to the chaos of those previous states. His embracing of the process, the journey, as simple fact / history cuts the mental red tape and drives him to pick up the pen, this time, ith eyes for something else. The writer relishes, at this stage of his evolution, probing the possibilities undulating from the egg-go-round of ideas in his head, ovulating blanks until … bingo! Speared by a cross-wind and the point of his pen—It’s come to life, after all. Or maybe not?
      Simply put, the pen looping across the page is like a waltz to him, the clacking of the keyboard—jazz. Even during his lapses, he now revels in the fact that there will be failures, that some of his musings will fall flat, and become, to quote Heiner Mueller, “the petrification of a hope.” Not everything that should be written is written, he now realizes. And that is part of the art, this inability to procreate constantly: he is not a fish.
      It is thus the act that both feeds and soothes his compulsion, that blind writing for days on projects which may or may not be realized, which makes all of it not only bearable, but worthwhile. The writer suffers from a glad obsession, something that most people will never comprehend. And when he’s come to terms with the mania, the existentially hectic caresses and blows, the slow drag of personal evolution, the mind a frothing dervish, he may decide to deem himself to be, as others have told him, “gifted.” And perhaps he reads one day that “gift” means “poison” in German. And he knows it’s true—but he likes this feeling, this drug. He enjoys the act for its sake and not just for its fruits, much as he liked the strychnine better than the actual hallucinogens in LSD back in the university days. And he continues to crank it out—to his satisfaction—whether or not anyone is around to hear the tree in the forest fall.    

Monica W. Munn

MONICA MUNN is an American writer living in Munich, Germany. She has won various awards and prizes for my short fiction, including five inclusions in O Georgia! A Collection of the Southeast's Newest and Most Talented Writers.  She is currently working on two book projects (fiction), and recently completed a collection of fictional anecdotes about the life of Georgia O'Keeffe in collaboration with another American writer.