Article 20435 of alt.conspiracy: Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.individualism,alt.censorship,talk.politics.misc,misc.headlines,soc.culture.usa Subject: Part 10, NOAM CHOMSKY: The New World Order Message-ID: <1993Feb12.184117.17073@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Followup-To: alt.conspiracy Keywords: NOAM CHOMSKY: The New World Order Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: UVA. FREE Public Access UNIX! Lines: 145 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (continuation) NOAM CHOMSKY: That brings us right up until today. As far as I can see, that's what's happening in Madrid. This last comment. There is some thinking behind this. There is a strategic conception behind it. It's one which is more or less permanent. It's part of the old world order, the "new world order" and all the next ten years' world order, and so on. The strategic conception about the Middle East is pretty simple. The major issue is the energy reserves. The U.S. has to control them. Nobody else is allowed to interfere in U.S. turf. Too important. There's a method for controlling them. The method is, first of all, to construct an "Arab facade", family dictatorships which sort of manage it for us. They're very weak, so you don't have to worry about them having any funny ideas. The "Arab facade" has to be protected from the population of the region. That requires regional enforcers (that's the second part), preferably non-Arab. They have an easier time killing Arabs. So that's Turkey, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, to provide sort of a Praetorian guard for the Saudi elite, and so on. That's what [Israel's first Prime Minister] Ben-Gurion used to call "a periphery pact." So there is this regional enforcer system. And then, in the background, there are the guys with the real muscle -- the United States and Britain, in case things get out of control. That's the system, and that doesn't change very much. Now, anyone who contributes to this system has some rights. The "Arab facade" obviously contributes. They manage the oil wells for us. The regional enforcers contribute. They have rights. We obviously have rights; in fact, ultimately, we're the only ones who do. And so does our British lieutenant, so long as they remain a lieutenant. What about the Palestinians? Well, they don't contribute to this system. They don't have wealth. They don't have power. In fact, they're a damn nuisance. They stir up Arab nationalism; you know, that is these pressures for these democratic openings that are always a problem. So they have a negative value, in fact. And since they contribute nothing to our domination of the region, it follows, by quite simple logic, that they have no human rights whatsoever. That's an elementary principle of statecraft. Human rights depend on your contribution to the needs of power and profit. Other than that, it's irrelevant. Well, they don't have any rights. In fact, they have negative rights. They're even a nuisance. And from that, you can pretty well predict U.S. policy. And, in fact, it works pretty well. Remember, this stuff is not quantum physics. You don't have to be a big thinker to understand it. Big efforts are made in the academic disciplines and elsewhere to make it look difficult. But, in fact, it's all pretty straightforward and, at least to my knowledge, there's almost nothing in international affairs or, again, in this stuff that a literate teen-ager couldn't figure out within a few minutes. And that's pretty much the way it works. If you understand it, you can see what's going on, and you can usually pretty well predict what's going to happen. You have to remember to translate "politically correct" discourse back into English so you can get out of those problems, but that's not too hard, either. With regard to the Palestinians, the position really has not changed, as far as I'm aware, since about 1948. Back in 1948, the Joint Chiefs of Staff had already recognized Israel. They were impressed by Israel's military victories, and they recognized it as the second most powerful regional military force and a possible potential base for U.S. power. That relationship then got established in later years, but there's no time to discuss it. There was also a discussion of the Palestinians. The Israeli foreign records show it. The U.S. didn't talk about it much, and didn't care about them. But the Foreign Ministry in Israel -- Moshe Sharrett's Foreign Ministry (this is, incidentally, the doves) pointed out in their internal records that the Palestinians .... they said: "They will be crushed! They will be dispersed like human waste, and will join the most impoverished masses in the Arab world!" So there's no worry about them. As Mark Peretz put it: "They're just another crushed nation, like the Kurds. And therefore, we don't have to pay much attention to them. That's been the policy ever since. And, as I just mentioned, that was Yitzhak Rabin's statement to the PEACE NOW leaders in February, 1989. He assured them that they will be broken. Well, will they be broken? Actually, the answer doesn't lie in the Middle East. It lies in the hands of those who are funding the operation. There is certainly no hope -- no faith in the President's "noble" intentions, or other illusions. Rather, it's necessary to do some other things. The first one is to clear away the mountains of rubble that conceal the events of history -- not only in this case, but in every other one -- to view what's happening without any illusions, and to create public pressures that can put an end to the extreme rejectionist policies that the United States has been pursuing virtually alone in the World. If we're honest, we'll also be able to see that this is true in Central America and, indeed, throughout the subject domains generally of what is euphemistically called "the South". The President is right, to a degree, when he says "What we say goes." What remains to be determined is what we choose to be. Thanks. (END OF SPEECH) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A 90-minute video documentary, from which this transcript was made, is available exclusively from JCOME. In addition to the full Chomsky lecture, the documentary contains background information about Chomsky and JCOME -- the only Jewish-American organization that has Chomsky on its Advisory Committee. JCOME is extending a special offer at this time. To get a copy of the video documentary simply send a check for $20 (only $15 for the documentary and $5 shipping) and indicate you read about Chomsky and JCOME on Internet or e-mail. Send to: The Jewish Committee on the Middle East P.O. Box 18367 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone orders cannot be taken. But for additional information about JCOME -- including copies of recent magazine ads and the MID-EAST REALITIES newsletter that can be sent directly to your fax machine -- call JCOME 24-hours daily to: (202) 362-JCOME (202) 362-5266 E-mail: jcome@mcimail.com FAX: (202) 362-6965 [JCOME on MCIMail] + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + JCOME would be grateful to you for posting the installments of this transcript to computer bulletin boards, as well as posting hardcopies in public places, both on and off campus. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Transcribed for JCOME by John DiNardo. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The episodes of this and other series can be retrieved via anonymous ftp from the site: red.css.itd.umich.edu Log in with name "anonymous" or "ftp" and supply your e-mail address as the password. The files are kept in the directory /poli/Essays/Conspiracy Instructions for ftp retrieval are dependent upon what sort of system the user is on. On a UNIX machine, at the command prompt, type the following: ftp red.css.itd.umich.edu This may be different on IBMs and Vax systems. Archivist: Paul Southworth, pauls@css.itd.umich.edu