Article 20555 of alt.conspiracy:
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.individualism,alt.censorship,talk.politics.misc,misc.headlines,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Part 2,  U.S. Government Poisons Generations of Americans
Message-ID: <1993Feb16.203533.29405@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Followup-To: alt.conspiracy
Keywords:  U.S. Government Poisons Generations of Americans
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: UVA. FREE Public Access UNIX! 
Lines: 146

    The principles of nature are indomitable, despite modern 
    industry's assault upon nature from every front. The emporers of
    Big Business are poisoning our Earth, while they concomitantly
    poison all life forms, from the simplest organisms to the human 
    species. Unless we now begin to unmask and combat these shadow
    dictators -- the true culprits who are causing the myriad diseases 
    which have long since been decimating our high-tech societies --
    our children of the 21st Century and beyond shall be doomed to  
    live brief lives besieged by illnesses, a state-of-affairs which
    is now beginning to plague our industrial society, despite their
    corporate mass media's smokescreen concealing their culpability. 

 [transcript of a tape-recorded speech given by V.E. Irons, at the
  age of 89, before a convention of the National Health Federation]:

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   
                          (continuation)
V.E. IRONS:
We've got a Food Law. We're the only country in the World that has 
a Food Law. What I want to show you is that we have NO SUCH THING as
a Food Law to protect the consumer. All the Food Law has EVER done
is to protect the processers, the manufacturers and the chemical
industry. Because they NEVER would allow Dr. Wiley to fully enforce
it.  I'm going to read his own words. He says:

  "I am now convinced that the freedom which belongs to every
   private American citizen can be used more fruitfully in rallying
   public opinion to the support of pure food and drugs than could
   the limited activity left to me in the position which I have just
   vacated. I propose to devote the remainder of my life -- with 
   such ability as I have at my command and with such opportunities 
   as may arise -- to promotion of the principles of civic 
   righteousness and industrial integrity which underlie the Food
   and Drug Act, in the hope that it may be administered in the 
   interest of the People-at-large instead of that of a 
   comparatively few mercenary manufacturers and dealers.

Page 94. On page 95 ..... By the way -- how was he able to get the
Food Law through? Because THE NATION Magazine, THE WORLD Magazine, 
THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS and a whole lot of newspapers backed him up
thoroughly in everything he was doing. They backed up his "poison
squad". He had a "poison squad" which were young college boys who
agreed to take these poisons for a certain length of time, but they
were permitted to quit it whenever they wanted to. And he proved 
all of his contentions. Now, he thought he had a lot of trouble.
Just imagine, he only had to deal with just a few adulteraters --
just a few processers then. Today, we have THOUSANDS of them.
And here's what THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS said when he resigned:

  "If the People exhibited the same persistence in looking after
   their interests that illegimate business displays in looking 
   after its interests, the things of which we complain would soon 
   be brought to an end and prosperity, like a tidal wave, would 
   flood the land. For twenty years, at least, the food poisoners 
   of the country have waged war on Dr. Harvey W. Wiley, and since 
   the passage of the Pure Food Act in 1906, they have trebled
   efforts to have him discharged. These Borgias of Business have
   won, because the circumstances attending Dr. Wiley's recent 
   resignation make it practically, in effect, a dismissal.
   Dr. Wiley resigned because the fundamental principles of the Pure
   Food Law have been strangled because he has been powerless to punish 
   the manufacturers of misbranded and adulterated drugs and foods,
   and because the powers of his position have been nullified by
   EXECUTIVE ORDER -- not by the United States Congress, but by
   executive order.

Now he goes on to explain certain decisions. Now understand this.
The Bureau of Chemistry, of which he was the chief, was actually
under the Agricultural Department at that time. He goes on to show
how the Agricultural Department .... he names the men, James Wilson,
Frank McVay, Secretary of the Treasury, and Charles Nagle, Secretary
of Commerce and Labor rescinded his decisions, numbers 45, 65, 95
and 98 -- rescinded them all in favor of the manufacturers.
And here's what he says:

  "This decision, directly contrary to many Federal courts,
   promulgated by the three secretaries charged with the duty of
   making rules and regulations for carrying the law into effect, is
   the most astonishing exhibition of illegality ever perpetrated.
   No higher act of open contempt of judicial findings has ever been
   made by anyone whose duty it is to follow the courts' decisions.

   It would have been bad enough as an attempt at construing the 
   meaning of this law prior to judicial opinion. In the face of the
   facts, it is a flagrant contempt of court."

In other words, they didn't try to decide before the court decided.
They waited until the court had decided, and THEN set the decisons
aside. What are you going to do when the executive won't obey?

  "All of the interests which were engaged in adulterating and 
   misbranding foods were greatly heartened by this victory. If one
   class of misbranders and adulterers could receive immunity by 
   executive order, why not apply the same principles to all forms 
   of adulteration and misbranding. The dikes that held the swelling
   flood of adulterations and misbrandings of our beverages were 
   broken down and the waves of food adulterations swept over and
   devastated the country."

I just want to show you what he was up against -- what you're up
against. And it's ten times worse now than it was then.

  [JD: And it's a hundred times worse now than it was when this
   speech was made.]

He says "the following violations of law" ..... Now these are actual
things that he was trying to fight:

  "The following violations of law were permitted and protected by 
   this crowd: the use of benzoate of soda as a preservative of
   food, the use of sulfur dioxide and sulfite as bleaching agents 
   and as food preservatives, the use of saccharin as a sweetener 
   in foods, up to an amount not exceeding three-tenths of a gram,
   and the free and unrestricted use of alum in food products.
   
   It is a striking comment also, regarding the attitude of Congress
   and the People-at-large, that no steps have ever been taken, from
   1911 to 1928, to correct these outrages upon the American People
   and to attempt to restore the law to its power and purpose, as
   enacted. Administration after administration has come and gone, 
   and these abuses still persist."
   
Now, they finally decided to establish this Remson Committee
directly under the Department of Agriculture, not under Dr. Wiley.
In other words, they were coordinating the Committee under as much
power as could be [wielded against Dr. Wiley]. 

Now they listened to this Remson Committee, which was a bunch of
scientists, like the many of them we have today who are PAID by food
processers to get certain findings.  And they got them!
                         (to be continued)
*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

    To penetrate the smokescreen of mass-media fraud is to learn of
    the staggering realities and the resultant emergencies festering 
    beneath the surface of public awareness.  If WE fail to tell the
    American People -- who, then, will tell them?  And what will be 
    the price to be paid by all of us for the delusions of the 
    TV-mesmerized majority?

    Please post the episodes of this ongoing series to computer 
    bulletin boards, and post hardcopies in public places,
    both on and off campus.    

         John DiNardo

