Will The War In Kurdistan Spread To Western Turkey? Interview With Dogan Roj, ERNK European Representative In the province of Sivas in central Turkey, 450km east of Ankara, there has been intense fighting over the past few days between units of the ARGK, the armed wing of the PKK, and the Turkish army. Up until now, most of the fighting had been limited to the southeast. Which side started this offensive in Sivas province? First, let me remind people that PKK chairman Abdullah Ocalan announced a unilateral ceasefire on behalf of the PKK on December 15, 1995. In his statement, he said that the ceasefire would last until a new government is formed after the elections, provided that army units do not continue with their destruction strategy. Tansu Ciller, the Turkish prime minister, immediately declared that there would be no negotiations with terrorists. She therefore proved that the offer of a ceasefire would not be seriously considered. But despite that, we have kept our word. When the ceasefire was announced, however, we made it clear that we would be forced to defend ourselves if operations were launched against us. The recent clashes were brought about by the Turkish state, which is seeking to press forward with its operations. The Kurdish guerrilla units are simply defending themselves. In addition to Sivas, the Turkish government has also launched operations in other regions. But there is a new strategy, namely to carry out these operations in the name of the state governor. There have been some clashes, and 50 soldiers have been killed. According to press reports, the ARGK didn't previously have any units stationed in the Sivas region. Were units simply concentrated there in order to react to the army offensive? No, the ARGK already had units in this regions. In his ceasefire declaration, Abdullah Ocalan stressed that we are prepared to accept peace, if the Turkish state is willing. But if not, then the war won't simply continue in Kurdistan, rather it will advance even more forcefully all over. Sivas is a stronghold of the Islamic Welfare Party (Refah), which received about 22% of the vote and was thereby the winner in the recent early general election. Do you think there's a connection between Refah's strength and the Turkish army's operation there? I don't think so. In Sivas, many people are loyal to the Turkish state. The Turkish state purposely made lots of propaganda on behalf of Refah in the cities. Many Kurds and Turks are religious and follow Islam. Refah made use of this, in that they went to people's homes with the Koran and said, either you vote for Refah or Allah will punish you. But throughout all of Kurdistan, it was plain to see that, despite all of the repression, the people's choice was HADEP, which was the strongest party in Kurdistan with more than 35% of the vote. Refah only won 18% in Kurdistan. Following Refah's election victory, will the PKK now take on more Islamic aspects in order to increase their acceptance in the population? No. The Kurdish population faces a certain reality. Contemporary Islam is not true Islam, that which was originally preached by Mohamed. Contemporary Islam cannot account for the oppression of people as we know it. People who call themselves "faithful to Islam" do nothing to stop the murderous war which is being waged against the Kurdish people. They are contradicting Islam. Are there, in your opinion, liberating elements within Islam? It's hard to say that exactly. We are not fighting for an Islamic society, rather for a socialist society. That allows us to recognize the reality of the Kurdish people. Even if there are principles in Islam which do not contradict the socialist principles of the PKK, the PKK will nonetheless continue with the class struggle. Certain human goals, which cannot necessarily be connected to Islam or other religions, are in line with our goals, for example our right to existence and the right to have our own state. (Interview by Charlotte Spielmann. Published in Junge Welt Nr.2, January 3, 1996. Translated by Arm The Spirit.)